Connect with us

HEALTH

My food revolution: how I fell in love with the gluten-free diet | Digestive disorders

Published

on

IIt all starts with a strange tingling sensation on my tongue as I board the tube in central London. After about five minutes, I start to wonder if I’m feeling a little faint (or is it just really, really hot in here?). After 15 I know: I will vomit all the contents of my stomach into a bag full of fruit from my friend’s father’s garden. “Get some apples and pears from Normandy,” she said charmingly just an hour or two ago as we sat down to my 40th birthday afternoon tea. She had no idea what horror was about to befall that harmless little bag.

A few minutes later, as I stood on the side of a road in north-east London, vomiting into a trash can in broad daylight, it occurred to me that people must think I was drunk. But alcohol has nothing to do with my current predicament. You can only blame the buns for this. Or maybe sandwiches. I certainly have my suspicions about the dainty little pie whose dough tasted so good, so buttery, so, well, not gluten-free, which I double-checked with the waitress. But the fact of the matter is that you suffer from celiac disease: you are often not quite sure who is to blame. You just know that there was a crime and your poor, long-suffering gut became a victim.

Near the end of a pasta-filled two-year stint in Italy as a Guardian correspondent in Rome, I realized that something was seriously wrong with what my mother would have called my “innards.” I remember calling her after a trip to Venice (I think it was to cover George Clooney’s wedding show – here’s a good contrast) convinced that the excruciating laryngeal spasms and debilitating fatigue I was experiencing were caused by giardia, a tiny parasite, spreading diarrheal diseases. “But it says on the Internet that usually Giardia only gets infected when traveling to remote places where there is no clean water,” my mother said or something, softly and dubiously. “I was in Venice!” I lamented stubbornly that the sharp waters of the Grand Canal had bedridden me. I didn’t cheat on any of us.

A few months later – after weeks of mysterious and relentlessly unpleasant gastrointestinal symptoms – I finally went to see a general practitioner in Britain. I went to the doctor on a gloomy vacation in the US, when I was practically unable to leave the apartment, but they prescribed antibiotics, which did nothing and stung several hundred dollars, so I was not optimistic. But I was in despair: my illness began to dominate my life. I lost a lot of weight. I was so weak that I ended up leaving Italy without telling a lot of people because I just didn’t have the strength – physical or mental – to call them, let alone meet. (If you are one of them, sorry.)

But this doctor was wonderful, and it was only in hindsight that I realized how extraordinary she was. When she heard about my symptoms, she immediately referred me for a blood test, and a few days later she called me at work to break the news: blood tests showed that I was severely anemic and had celiac disease. What did I remember saying, that gluten thing? Never! When I was really sick, the only thing I could stomach was these little salty wheat crackers; I’d eat them in packets and packets… Oh. The gears of my brain began to slowly turn.

I got lucky with my doctor. I have since learned that many people struggle with all the symptoms of celiac disease for years – bloating, diarrhea, vomiting, heartburn, brain fog: a veritable smorgasbord of pleasures – and have never been diagnosed. Whatever the case, I was told to continue eating gluten until I had a biopsy that would confirm my diagnosis by showing damage to the small intestine. And then? What treatment would I like to know? When can I get back to crackers?

A gluten-free diet is the only option for people with celiac disease. Photographer: Jill Meade/The Guardian

The answer was short and straight forward: never. The only way for a person with celiac disease — an autoimmune disease that, if left undiagnosed, can lead to slow organ damage and colon cancer — is to give up gluten forever. Now, given that this protein is found in wheat, rye, barley and, due to the high levels of cross-contamination, oats, this may seem like a giant problem. This means, obviously, no (regular) buns, cakes, sandwiches. That also means no beer, no Colman mustard, no soy sauce. Don’t try this street food, don’t risk a new chip, don’t linger at the holiday buffet.

This is the end of one era of your life and the beginning of another. Of course, there is a sense of loss. But by this point, many people are so excited to finally find the answer to their problems that they’re ready to start over. Of course I was. It was disturbing enough to hear about my anemia, which was so severe that my doctor said that in previous years I would have been hospitalized. (These days, commercial-strength iron pills have done the trick.) On top of that, a bone scan showed that I had osteopenia, a precursor to osteoporosis. I was in my early 30s. The consultant said that I had probably been suffering from celiac disease for about ten years without even knowing it.

So I was desperate to feel healthy and energized again – although I did wonder if it had been so long ago that I forgot how it felt. I rushed to decipher this new and unfamiliar world: one of looking at every label on every food to see if I can eat it or not (at first I was confused, but now I do it without even thinking about it, my brain is like barcode reader). Shopping took a lot longer. Eating out at restaurants was a minefield. (I’m lucky my partner is a fantastic cook – I’m hopeless.)

Going to visit friends was painful. It’s incredibly difficult, especially if you’re a chronic caterer like me, to tell a person who has struggled to make something gluten-free that you still can’t eat it because they added one banned ingredient or used the same the pan for regular pasta and pasta GF or got sprinkled with soy sauce at the last moment or, well, the list of annoying potential mistakes is unfortunately endless. It’s better for everyone if I just bring mine. I do the same thing when I travel abroad for work, which on the one hand is heartbreaking in countries like Lebanon with one of the most delicious cuisines known to man, but honestly it’s easier to report if you’re not trying to vomit in your purse and I’d rather not risk it. Having said that, the best gluten free bread I have ever had was in Bethlehem.

If you are reading this because you have recently been diagnosed, please do not worry. You will feel healthy again! You will enjoy food again! It will be a little different, but in a few years you won’t even notice. It becomes normal. There is a huge variety of gluten-free products in stores that celiacs could not even dream of 30 years ago. M&S Made without wheat the range is my personal favorite although it’s not cheap and I’ve recently discovered Leigh’s Gluten Free Bakerywho makes delicious focaccia and delivers celiac-friendly donuts to my door: a dream! Oh and I know what I said wasn’t soy sauce, but really Tamari also good.

While it may not seem like it at first, you can still eat a huge variety of foods on a gluten-free diet: fruits, vegetables, legumes, potatoes, rice, and, depending on your diet, dairy, meat, and fish. If anything, my diagnosis has made us cook more from scratch and healthier for the whole family. Our children are well aware of the gastrointestinal tract: a five-year-old child has been known to very dramatically mimic with his whole body the collapse of the villi of the small intestine, defeated by a mortal enemy: wheat. I found best gluten free pastries in Paris and mastered the art Sticky Toffee GF Pudding.

One day, maybe I’ll even be able to venture out for afternoon tea again. But not anytime soon; I still have memories of this bag.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HEALTH

Proper disposal of massage oil after its expiration date

Published

on

After the expiration date, the massage oil should be disposed of responsibly. Proper disposal is important to ensure that the oil is not only removed from the massage area, but safely removed from the environment. It is also important to ensure that the oil is disposed of in a manner that does not create health or safety issues. Proper disposal of massage oil ensures that not only is it removed from the site, but it also has no negative impact on the environment.

It is important to properly dispose of massage oil when it reaches its expiration date. Massage oil is a product that can be hazardous to the environment if not properly disposed of. To ensure that recycling massage oil done safely, masseurs should check product packaging for disposal instructions. In many cases, massage oil must be taken to a hazardous waste collection center for proper disposal. It is also important to ensure that the massage oil is stored in an airtight container if it needs to be delivered to a hazardous waste collection center. In some cases, massage oil can be recycled in accordance with local regulations.

  • Check the massage oil expiration date before disposal.

When it comes to massage therapy, there are several factors to consider to ensure the safety of your clients and yourself. One of the most important factors to consider is the shelf life of massage oils. Check the expiration date before disposal and replace the expired oil as soon as possible. Not only is this important for safety and hygiene reasons, but it can also help you save money and keep your massage practice running smoothly.

Before disposing of massage oil, it is important to make sure that the product has not expired. Checking the expiration date is the best way to make sure the oil is still safe to use. All massage oils must have an expiration date on the packaging and it is recommended to check this date before use. If the expiration date has passed, the oil may have deteriorated and cannot be used safely. It is important to dispose of any expired massage oils in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations.

  • Never pour massage oil down the drain

Regular massage always requires massage oil or lotion. This oil is an essential element of massage as it allows the massage therapist to manipulate your muscles and provide a pleasant sensation. While massage oil is essential for massage, it comes with a few drawbacks, especially when it comes to cleansing. For example, if you are giving a massage at a client’s home, never pour the massage oil down the drain. This is not only harmful to the environment, but can also cause plumbing problems.

Never pour massage oil down the drain, as this can lead to clogging and other plumbing problems. When massage oil comes into contact with water, it can harden and cause clogged pipes. In addition, unwanted debris can build up along the pipe walls, leading to plumbing problems and eventually clogging. Massage oil should be disposed of in the trash and not down the drain to prevent these problems. In addition, it is recommended to wipe up spilled oil immediately, because oil can damage porous surfaces by seeping into them. Never pour massage oil down the drain; instead, put it in the trash according to proper disposal procedures.

Continue Reading

HEALTH

Allegations of racism leveled at House of Representatives hearing on coronavirus

Published

on

WASHINGTON. Science writer Nicholas Wade arrived on Capitol Hill Wednesday to testify before a Republican commission on the origins of the coronavirus, but was instead asked questions about “Troubled Legacy”, his controversial 2014 book on race and genetics, which Democrats noted was endorsed by notorious racist and anti-Semite David Duke, as well as other white supremacists.

“I have nothing to do with white supremacist views,” Wade said at one point during the hearing.

“However, they love you,” retorted Rep. Kweisi Mfume, M.D., arguing that Wade’s presence was an affront to any legitimate inquiry into the origins of the coronavirus — the subject of Wednesday’s hearing.

Former NAACP head Mfume said he was “appalled that this hearing is now about race.”

Writer Nicholas Wade testifies before a committee of the House of Representatives.

Writer Nicholas Wade testifies Wednesday before a House subcommittee on the coronavirus pandemic. (Chip Somodeville/Getty Images)

Visibly trembling, Mfume told Wade that he was “absolutely offended that you will have the opportunity to take this platform and add something important to it.”

A tense exchange has cast doubt on whether inviting Wade to testify at the first hearing of the House Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic was an effective move by the Republican majority, which seeks to legitimize the notion that the coronavirus was the product of a lab accident in China.

Wade proponent of this hypothesisbut his past writings on genetics and race seem to have frustrated his attempts to focus the conversation on the pandemic.

The committee’s leading Democrat, Rep. Raul Ruiz of California, used his opening statement to discredit Wade. “His participation undermines the credibility of this hearing,” he said.

Briefly, Capitol Hill was plunged into a nearly decade-old controversy, though the topics understandably continue to stir deep passions today.

A native of England and a graduate of Cambridge, Wade has worked for the prestigious Science magazine. and nature in the late 1970s and early 80s, by which point he had settled in the United States. Hello joined the New York Times in 1982. and will remain in the newspaper for 30 years.

Rep. Raul Ruiz speaks at a House subcommittee hearing.

Rep. Raul Ruiz, D-Calif., expresses concern that the subcommittee has invited Wade to testify. (Chip Somodeville/Getty Images)

Wade has written several books in his career, but none have been as explosive as his 2014 foray into the connection between race and genetics—a connection that by then many came with a discount.

In an attempt to repair the disputed correlation, Wade ventured into some of the most obscene areas of what was once known as scientific expertise. (His supporters would say that he was dragged into this dangerous territory by detractors who had not actually read his book, but some of those critics appeared to be familiar with his arguments.)

Racial Science was a favorite pastime of the Nazis, who sought to collect evidence, such as the shape of the skull, to prove that Jews and other people of non-European descent were inherently inferior. eugenicists in the United States, similar arguments were used to try to restrict immigration or expand civil rights for blacks.

While racial differences may seem huge culturally and socially, genetic differences between populations are actually quite insignificant.

Wade objected to this prevailing view. Intending to “demystify the genetic basis of race”, he attempted to describe distinct racial groups that he claimed originated in Africa, Europe, and East Asia. He then attempted to explain how the three groups evolved different genomes and how these differences shape their respective cultures.

These explanations have led to some highly suspicious claims, such as that the Jews were uniquely “adapted to capitalism” – a classic anti-Semitic cliché. Meanwhile, people of African descent, according to Wade’s analysis, had a “violent propensity”.

Former New York Times editor and writer Nicholas Wade.

During Wednesday’s hearing, Wade was asked questions about his controversial 2014 book on race and genetics, A Troubled Legacy. (Chip Somodeville/Getty Images)

The mainstream reaction to the book was harsh. IN his reviewThe Times called A Troubled Legacy a “deeply flawed, misleading and dangerous book” that gives racists license while accused Wade trade in “marginal racist theories masquerading as mainstream biology”. American conservative found the book unconvincing.

IN letter to the New York Times Book ReviewHe was accused by 139 scientists (including many whose work Wade cited) of “misappropriating” research results to advance discrediting arguments. They stated that “in the field of population genetics, Wade’s hypotheses are not supported.”

He hit the news again with the advent of the coronavirus, becoming one of the first science writers to speak out against the plausibility of the prevailing view that the pathogen originated from an animal before it entered the human population, most likely in the U.S. wildlife market. Chinese city of Wuhan.

Wade detailed the case for the so-called laboratory leak theory. Average post in May 2021. This article remains a milestone for other skeptics of the official Chinese version. However, many scientists believe that the virus originated in animals and then passed to humans.

Wade strenuously defended his record – and his book – on Wednesday. “It was a decidedly non-racist book. As far as I know, there are no scientific errors in it. It contains no racist statements. It emphasizes the theme of unity,” he told the deputies sitting in front of him.

But his Democratic critics remained unconvinced, while some supporters of the lab leak hypothesis expressed frustration on social media that the important question of the origin of the coronavirus is being obscured.

Continue Reading

HEALTH

Gym brothers on TikTok eat dog food, but experts say it could be harmful

Published

on

Clarisi promised viewers that he would try the dog food if his video got 15,000 likes. Upon posting, his video garnered 2.5 million likes: “I knew I had to try,” he told BuzzFeed News.

“The dog food tasted very dry. Needed so much water after eating,” Clarisi said in an email to BuzzFeed News. “Tastes like little bits of dirt and I definitely don’t think it was worth it. Even though it has a lot of protein, I would take a steak or protein powder.”

IN This Video, he adds, “It’s for the benefit” when he eats Kibbles ‘n Bits. After grimacing and gagging as he chews on the product, he tells followers, “I promise you guys, it’s not worth it.”

So, before you head to your local PetSmart store and consider trying this approach on your own, here’s what you need to know about eating dog food, the actual amount of protein per serving, the possibility of foodborne illness, and what actually means “for human” label. keep in mind. Experts told BuzzFeed News that just because your pets eat it doesn’t mean you should.

What is included in dog food?

Although the FDA requires that all Pet food must be safe for animals.Sanitary-produced and free of harmful substances, Melissa Majumdar, spokeswoman for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, told BuzzFeed News that dog food is not subject to the same rules and regulations as human food. As a result, dog foods typically have label for intended use.

Pet food may contain not only animal by-products found in human foods, such as bone meal and organs, but also others such as udder and lungs, which, according to the Association of American Feed Control Officials, is not the organization that defines the ingredients and sets the labeling standards for feed regulators. These by-products are considered safe for pets, but not for humans.

“While most of the ingredients in dog food are similar to human products, they are designed to meet the needs of dogs, not people who have different nutritional priorities,” Majumdar said. “In addition, they contain foods that we do not need in large quantities in our diet. If you read the ingredients of dog food, you will find chicken by-product and animal fat.”

While the term “human” is sometimes used on dog food labels, it doesn’t mean much, says Tracy Navarra, a veterinarian at Peachtree Hills Animal Hospital. “There is a misconception about what ‘human level’ means,” Navarre told BuzzFeed News. “Edibles for humans are very different and are regulated by the FDA. The human level means nothing.”

According to AAFCO, pet food labeled “fit for human consumption” not considered edible for humans. In most cases, this means that it contains certain ingredients and is produced in a facility that is licensed to process human food, but is still not intended for human consumption.

However, in an email to BuzzFeed News, Pedigree told us that “Our products are designed for dogs and cats but will not be harmful if consumed by humans. The manufacturing processes and research that go into our products are the same and in some cases even better than those of human food manufacturers.”

But just like human food, pet food can be contaminated with certain types of bacteria, such as salmonella and E. coli.

Although the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have labeled dry food, canned food, and fresh pet food as safe, there is a risk that people will get sick if they eat them, especially recalled products. listeriosis, which found in recalled pet productsMaybe cause mild or serious health problemsfrom abdominal pain to infections of the blood and nervous system.

Nutritional risks likely outweigh benefits

Dog food does not meet the nutritional requirements of human food, just as human food does not meet the nutritional requirements of dog food.

“The dog’s gut is designed to deal with pathogens, bacteria, dirt, viruses, debris, parasites, etc. that the human gut is not used to,” Navarra said. “We are not the same, so we should not eat the same food. Although the nutritional requirements for proteins, carbohydrates, and fats may not differ greatly between humans and dogs, this should not be the deciding factor in voluntary dog ​​food selection.”

A dog’s digestive system can break down proteins faster and more efficiently than a human’s. Dogs can produce more stomach acid than humans, making it much easier for dogs to digest the ingredients found in pet food, including bone matter.

Usually, recommended dietary allowance for protein for healthy adults is 0.8 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight, which is 44 grams of protein per day for a 120-pound person and 55 grams of protein for a 150-pound person.

Protein is an important part of our diet, growth and development, but too much of it can negatively affect the bodypotentially causing bone, kidney, and liver problems and possibly an increased risk of cancer or coronary heart disease.

So how much protein does dog food actually contain?

The nutritional value of dog food is listed as a percentage of the dry matter, or dry matter, according to Majumdar. This means it has between 8 and 18 grams of protein per cup, according to Majumdar. For reference, a small dog can eat one cup of dog food a day, a medium sized dog about 2 cups, and large breed dog, 3 cups.

Clarisi received information from MyFitnessPal that seemed to suggest that 200 grams of Pedigree dog food, or about one cuphad 666 grams of protein.

However, Pedigree told BuzzFeed News that the highest percentage of protein in any of their dog foods is 28.7%, meaning that a serving of dry dog ​​food could contain about 60 grams of protein, as opposed to 666 grams.

A representative from MyFitnessPal declined to help us understand why our math wasn’t true, but they did confirm that TikTokers seemed to be making questionable life decisions based on the information.

“MyFitnessPal has really noticed a surge in people signing up for dog food due to a TikTok trend that was driven by men aged 18-24 looking to gain or maintain weight. The spike in enrollment mostly occurred between February 20 and 24,” MyFitnessPal said in a statement.

In any case, consuming more than 600 grams of protein will not be healthy. This is about two to three times more than a daily amount considered safe even for bodybuilders.

“Excessive protein increases stress on the kidneys, liver, and bones,” Majumdar said. “A person who consumes excessive amounts of protein can develop kidney stones, constipation, weight gain, and may miss out on essential nutrients and fiber found in other food groups. In the long term, we may also see higher cholesterol levels and heart disease or colon cancer with this diet.”

According to UK Pet Food, pet foods may contain levels of sodium that, while no cause for concern for animals, can cause hypertension in humans. Pets can eat dry or wet foods containing sodium and not experience increased thirst or water intake like humans.

“Dry dog ​​food, which is featured in some TikTok videos, can also be difficult to chew and digest,” Majumdar said. “The average person relies on food for 20% of their fluid needs, so eating mostly dry food can affect hydration.”

Luckily, there are other options that don’t require a trip to the pet food department.

Alternatives to protein intake

We got it: workouts fueled by protein and other nutrients can help build muscle mass and strength for exercise. However, carbohydrates are just as important for exercise and endurance, which can provide energy to support physical activity.

In fact, you may need more carbs than protein and people are encouraged to get 45% to 65% of calories from carbohydrates, which is between 225 and 235 grams per day if you are on a 2000 calorie diet. “They provide energy for fitness and muscle building,” Majumdar said. “If you’re feeling sluggish or recovering slowly after getting up, you may not be getting enough carbs.”

However, if you’re interested in getting protein, there are cheaper and safer ways to get enough protein in your diet. Majumdar told BuzzFeed News that lean proteins like skinless chicken or turkey, lean cuts of red meat, fish, lean dairy, eggs, beans, tofu, edamame, whey or soy protein powder are all good ways to get more protein. .

“If you’re looking for cheaper options, beans, both canned and dry, as well as canned meats like chicken and tuna, can help with the budget. Eggs are also usually cheaper than meat,” Majumdar said. “Vegetable proteins like beans and lentils can help save money and are rich in nutrients – fiber, protein, B vitamins. Beans cost us about 48 cents per pound compared to the average of $5.20 per pound. Be savvy and save on fat and bean cents.”

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2023 News Logics Media.